The league, you know, it's always been against the odious nepotism of "thieving Rome" and absolutely foreign to the typical patronage of dear old DC (and let's say each political party exists).
The Northern League party, this is also known, has always been consistency of its greatest virtue and, in fact, Calderoli has crashed several times to make peace with the Church reaffirming its Christian roots (the fact that he was married paganissimo with a "Celtic Rite" is a minor detail). Umberto Bossi, has always been a staunch anti-southern Italy, he married a Sicilian, and instead, the same Senatùr, promoter of cultural inferiority southerners, saw his son Renzo (pictured above) failed the examination three times of maturity. The monument to the consistency of the sermon, though, the good Leaguers have erected a few days ago by appointing the very small and newly-graduated Renzo Bossi member of an "observatory" Expo in Milan (consider that the most malicious created specifically to earn some mites to "Bossini").
Not only the Senatùr has thought of everything, and to accommodate the most of your ram (chicken), made sure that another sample of the League's excellent sermons and bad scratching, Francesco Speroni, named by his lackeys in Europe guess who ... It's simple: Renzo Bossi. The salary that has already graduated from this "Team Manager" of the Valley National will "only" 12,000 euro. But not scandalizzatevi, Gentlemen: if you do not prendetevala, poor plurilaureati 30's, you have to live with € 1000 per month and this "trout" (as he affectionately calls his father) will earn 12 times more. And who comes to blatant case of nepotism and intolerable, not know the curriculum of the bright-trained Renzo Bossi. The riassiumiamo below to pace the readers.
-mouth three times the state exam
-Team manager of Valley National
-inventor and promoter of "Bounce the clandestine"
Well: 12,000 € net per month deserved.
interesting these lines, right? Finally laid bare the hypocrisy of the lords of the estimated Lega Nord! I (but not only) I have found another great big, of hypocrisy. As the text above the hard-core Leaguers were self-proclaimed "Defender of the Christian roots", and then of course authorized by their "role" has been thrown (along with everyone else) against the ruling of the European Court, inviting the 'Italy to remove the crucifix in public places. Well, first of all on this issue I wanted to offer a reflection of Don Luigi Ciotti:
crucifixes to defend, the real ones, not those on the walls of schools. There are others. They are men and women who are struggling. That does not make it and die of starvation. E 'to them that we can not and must not remain indifferent. E 'to them that we must focus our efforts. A crucifix is \u200b\u200ban AIDS patient who needs care and support. A crucifix is \u200b\u200bthat Brazilian boy who died a few days ago in Turin. At home he had left his wife and children, had arrived here looking for a job, and did not have it done. We attended his funeral. There were so many people, many even knew him, but were there anyway, to share their suffering and pain. It 'just struggle to defend the symbols of what we believe, but at the same time must be very careful not to give in to pure idealism. He says the Gospel itself: the pieces of God are scattered throughout the world that surrounds us. We find them everywhere. In Specifically, in everyday life, among people who live next to us, and which often does not even realize the existence. E 'with these realities that we must learn to deal and to measure ourselves. We must learn to live with responsibility, as so many volunteers who devote their time to a well that is not only them but the public, everyone. We must all feel called to task, in large urban centers such as in the many small provincial towns. Participation is the first step in helping the most vulnerable. The crucified not only defend themselves with words. In fact, they too often are not enough. We must learn to deal with concrete reality, and reach out to people Sun, who no longer has a family and those who can not seek the help of loved ones.
Personally, and I know to be unpopular, I welcome the European decision. We are now, willy-nilly, in a multi-ethnic and multi-confessional ... Expose only the crucifix is \u200b\u200bdisrespectful of the variety of people who now make up our community. It would be fairer, if anything, to expose (in a school should be, first of all, to forge shared values \u200b\u200bfor the public good) images of people of different faiths who have changed our world for the better in the sign of unity among all people (in my mind, I know, the various Gandhi ... Mother Teresa ... Martin Luther King, etc.). I think no one would complain of this, in fact. M'innervosisce long, however, the hypocrisy of this whole mass of Italians so that, suddenly, he rediscovered the Christian and "so fond" of the crucifix. Strongly defending a someone who at times do not even know who he is, and whose teachings betray every day in every way imaginable. Eh, but no ... We must not give barbaric horde of Muslims who want to come to cut our church (which, among other things, they have never even asked to remove the symbol of Christianity) Jesus and rather stands as a symbol of culture (that even the Theologians and Researchers say that is a mistake to give a meaning to the crucifix that is not the religious one). In the midst of all this back to a sword Leaguers who defend the gospel without knowing, however, what is written in it:
2531 Mt
When the Son of Man comes in his glory with all his angels, he will sit on the throne of his glory. 32 And before him shall be gathered all nations, and he shall separate them one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, 33 and shall set the sheep on his right and goats on the left. 34 Then the King will say to those on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you since the foundation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, 36 naked and you clothed me, ill and you visited me in prison and you came to me. 37 Then the righteous will answer, 'Lord, when did we saw you hungry and we fed you, or thirsty and gave thee drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and you welcome, lacking clothes and clothe you? 39 And when did we see you sick or in prison and we came to visit you? 40 In response, the King will In truth I tell you every time you did it to one of these my brethren, you did it to me. 41 Then he will say to those on his left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me no drink: 43 I was a stranger and you welcomed me, naked and you clothed me, sick and in prison and you visited me. 44 Then they also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison and did not minister unto thee? 45 Then he will answer: In truth I tell you every time you did it to one of these my brethren, ye did it to me. 46 And they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life. "
say is that maybe these teachings of Jesus are not very consistent with those contained in the Act which provides for the crime of illegal immigration ... Or not? The Leaguers, who saw their "role" should apply the Gospel to the letter, it seems to me more than to feed or drink or dress the younger brother instead declare him a criminal, a criminal just because he had the misfortune to born unlucky. And then just for pleasure with the hypocrisy, we have the balls full. If the Italians love Jesus so much that endeavor to build a diverse, since they do not believe in the crucified would very much like this that put Italy in the last cross. Blue Soul
0 comments:
Post a Comment